Skip to main content

Filter by content types

Selecting one of the content types will trigger the filters and reload the page automatically
Showing 1 - 16 of 256 results
  • News 26 June 2024

    Carol Vorderman: The PPE scandal must be at the heart of the general election

    The Tories want to move on from the debacle over their unlawful VIP lane. We must hold them to account at the ballot box.

  • News 13 June 2024

    How we’ve laid the foundations for billions to be clawed back from the PPE scandal

    What we’ve spent years doggedly uncovering about the government’s dodgy deals and cronyism during the pandemic has now paved the way for the appointment of a covid corruption commissioner.

  • Crowdfunder

    The Tories’ last-ditch attempt to silence us on the PPE scandal

    The government is bringing legal proceedings against Good Law Project to stop it publishing an explosive new PPE story.

    Last week we asked the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) – and the company in question – to respond to a story we proposed to publish about astonishing undertakings given to secure a lucrative and controversial VIP contract.

    The story emerged from minutes of the Covid Clearance Board – the body which approved new PPE deals during the course of the pandemic. An organisation working with Good Law Project lawfully obtained a redacted copy of those minutes. But those redactions had been botched and could be undone to uncover an extraordinary revelation – one we think you ought to know.

    DHSC replied to our request for a comment with a formal letter before action headed: “Proposed Urgent Injunctive Relief” and said, unequivocally, that “if you indicate that your intention is to publish such information, we intend to seek an urgent interim injunction to prevent publication.” It asked us to make a variety of further promises including that we would “delete the incorrectly-redacted FOIA Response” and tell them who we shared the story with.

    We agreed to tell them if we planned to publish the story – but we refused to give them the broader undertakings they sought. Late on Monday, we told them we would publish at 12 noon on Wednesday 3 July. We have instructed a law firm and Counsel to act for us in those proceedings. We expect that defending the injunction will cost around £50,000 – including costs if the government succeeds.

  • News 21 February 2024

    The PPE scandal is far from over

    The Tory VIP lane was a high road to cronyism, says Henry Marsh.

  • News 21 December 2020

    Government PPE staff racing to cancel and delay excess orders

  • News 16 November 2021

    LEAKED: The Conservative politicians who referred companies to the PPE ‘VIP lane’

  • News 22 June 2020

    Windrush scandal

  • Case Update

    Revealed: Government bullied safety watchdog over PPE supplied by ‘VIPs’

  • News 17 April 2021

    Lobbying scandal

  • News 12 August 2021

    REVEALED: Secret meeting between firm chaired by Government’s PPE Tsar and UK minister to discuss PPE deals

  • Case Update

    Patel, Mirza and the Middlemen

  • Case Update

    EXCLUSIVE: Six more VIP-lane companies revealed

  • News 1 February 2022

    PPE to go up in smoke – literally – as the bill for waste tops £10 billion

  • News 14 April 2022

    The Government must end the building safety scandal for good

  • Case Update

    REVEALED: Government wasted £437 million of your money on unusable PPE from just three VIP suppliers

  • Case Update

    PPE masks not fit for purpose