We use limited cookies
We use cookies where necessary to allow us to understand how people interact with our website and content, so that we can continue to improve our service.
View our privacy policyContent warning: suicide
Just before parliament was dissolved on 30 May, the health secretary Victoria Atkins introduced an immediate ban on trans young people obtaining in the UK puberty blockers prescribed by regulated prescribers in France, Germany, Switzerland and throughout Europe.
The consequences are profound.
A medicine that young trans people have used for decades, that is lawfully prescribed throughout Europe, that is recommended by decades-old international treatment protocols, that cis people can continue to use, and the NHS can continue to prescribe to young trans people if they have already started, will no longer be available. In fact, it will become a criminal offence to supply in the United Kingdom puberty blockers to those caught by the ban, punishable by up to two years in prison.
The Cass report has been widely criticised – by the trans community, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, by the Endocrine Society and by the American Academy of Pediatrics – for its conclusions. But even the Cass report contemplates continued use of puberty blockers to treat trans people.
The ban also bypassed the normal requirement for consulting a statutory committee to protect the public interest. And introducing it shortly before parliament rose meant that parliament could not scrutinise it either.
Its results are predictable – and terrifying.
We have heard from a well-placed whistleblower inside the NHS that, in the seven years before the decision in the Bell case (concerning the use of puberty blockers), one person using Gender Identity Development Services lost their life. The NHS reacted to that decision by introducing immediate, heavy restrictions to NHS services for young trans people. And it did not lift them when the decision was overturned in the Court of Appeal. We have been informed that in the three years following the decision 16 people lost their lives. We have contemporaneous evidence that this concern was raised at the time and the whistleblower believes senior management took a decision to suppress evidence of the deaths. We put these allegations to the Tavistock, we know it received them, but it has failed to respond.
This ban closes off the only route to treatment left open by the restrictions on treatment in the NHS. Atkins’s shockingly callous decision is likely to lead to further deaths of young trans people. We have received many emails from desperately worried parents.
Trans Actual CIC, working with Good Law Project, has instructed Russell-Cooke solicitors and senior barristers David Lock KC, Jason Coppel KC and Rob Harland to advise on a legal challenge to the regulations. So we’re taking the first formal step in urgent legal proceedings against Atkins.
We will issue the case in court as soon as possible and will ask for an urgent hearing – but we desperately need your help.
10% of the funds raised will be a contribution to the general running costs of Good Law Project. It is our policy only to raise sums that we reasonably anticipate could be spent on the work we are crowdfunding for. However, if there is a surplus it will go to develop and support further work we do to fight for a better fairer future for all.
On 6 June 2024, following revised advice from Counsel, we made minor amendments to the description of the regulations
We sent our Pre-Action Letter to the health secretary, Victoria Atkins, on 4 June. Late on Monday 10 June we received a formal response from her lawyers. It attached some sensitive ministerial briefing documents. Early the next morning they sent us a further email demanding we delete the formal response. No legal basis was given for the demand so we refused.
Late on 13 June we received a replacement response and today we have issued our claim.
We would like to publish Victoria Atkins’s response – we think it needs to be in the public domain – but court rules prohibit this for the time being. And since our issued claim contains reference to those documents, we have decided not to publish it either.
However, we expect to be able to place this important material in the public domain in due course and we have asked the court to list the matter for an urgent hearing as soon as possible after 3rd July.
We have had response from the High Court to say that the case will be heard as soon as possible after 15th July for a one day hearing
The case is listed for 12th July in the High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, Administrative Court. Trans Actual, supported by Good Law Project, will face the new government’s Department of Health and Social Care
The High Court has ruled that the former health secretary Victoria Atkins did not break the law when using emergency powers to ban puberty blockers before the election.
However according to the judge, our evidence shows that young trans people have “had difficulties in obtaining access” to healthcare, including mental health care, since the ban was put in place, and both NHS England and the health department “should consider how implementation can be improved as soon as possible”.
After careful consideration, TransActual and the second claimant will not be appealing the verdict, particularly as an appeal is unlikely to be heard in a timely manner.
We believe the ban is ill-founded – particularly in light of the British Medical Association’s response– and we urge the Department of Health and Social Care to reconsider its position.
Thanks to the amazing support of Good Law Project supporters, we raised £60,328.61.
If you’d like to support our general work, you can do so here: